EU looks to strengthen oil and gas regs

It seems as though the European Union, in spite of recent economic difficulties, might be headed for a bit of a shakeup in safety laws in the Oil and Gas sector. Back in October 2011, EU energy chief Günther Oettinger published a limited proposal to boost safety requirements in the industry that is often belaguered by comparatively lax safety laws. 

The proposal has been stalled somewhat, but only as Members of European Parliament (MEPs) push to give the bill more teeth, namely by expanding its scope to consider delicate Artic ecosystems, adding ‘polluter pays’ laws, and ensuring greater oversight of the regulation’s implementation process.

If the EU does indeed move ahead with strengthened safety laws in the oil and gas sector, that’s great news for EHS professionals

Whatever safety rules the EU does implement, perhaps it should take a cue from Petrobras’ experience and consider including protections from unindentified sea monsters! (See video below.)

Walid Kattan is a member of Intelex’s Oil and Gas solutions team.

Safe Chemicals Act, calls for OSHA reform, new whistleblower complaint procedures and more on EHS This Week

On this week’s edition of EHS This Week:

  • OSHA’s issues final rule on whistleblower complaint procedures for the consumer products industry.
  • A Senate comittee approves a new Safe Chemicals Act.
  • Calls for dramatic OSHA reform and a whole lot more.

Remember to write us with your suggestions, questions and comments at paul@ehsthisweek.com. Also, if you are an industry expert and ever want to take part in the program, we’d love to have you. 

Until next week, enjoy the program!

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

NAOSH Week, big South Korea climate news, interesting data on American workers’ sleep habits and more on EHS This Week

This week we take a look at a variety of OSHA citations, the incoming onset of the biggest week in health and safety for the continent, NAOSH Week, significant climate legislation news out of South Korea — which seems to be following Mexico’s recent example — the Obama Administration’s new rules on gas fracking, and a whole lot more.

As mentioned, next week is NAOSH week and we will be doing our utmost to provide comprehensive coverage, given this is such a great opportunity to highlight the value of occupational health and safety across North America. It’s also particularly resonant, coming only days after both the International Day of Mourning for those injured or killed at the workplace (April 28) and International Workers’ Day last Monday.

As always, write us at paul@ehsthisweek.com or kristy@ehsthisweek.com with any suggestions, comments, or ideas for future shows. We’ve loved your feedback so far, but please, if you are interested on coming on the show, please let us know. We would love to have more industry experts participate in the podcast and discuss how we can improve conditions for workers around the world.

Till, next week — and do remember we are having a mid-week podcast to recognize NAOSH week — enjoy the show!

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Australian Governments finalize historic standardization of nationwide OHS regulations

In an effort to reduce incidences of work-related death, injury, and illness across the country, the Council of Australian Governments recently began to enact the harmonisation of work health and safety (WHS) laws, ratified in July 2008 with the signing of the Intergovernmental Agreement for Regulatory and Operational Reform in OHS. The move represents a significant departure from the former scenario in which all states, territories and the Commonwealth at large had been responsible for defining and enforcing their own health and safety laws which, although similar to one another, featured significant differences in their application and detail.

In response to industry calls for greater national consistency, currently half of the Commonwealth states and territories (with Western Australia and Victoria as the notable exceptions at the moment) have begun to implement the nationally harmonized WHS legislation, which took effect on January 1, 2012. The harmonization model calls for the Commonwealth as well as all states and territories to begin enforcing the model laws.

Some quick facts on the legislation:

Purpose of the WHS Act: In general terms, the WHS Act provides a framework to protect the health, safety, and welfare of all workers at work and all other people who might be affected by work.

Harmonisation aims to:

  • Protect the health and safety of workers and other people by eliminating or reducing workplace risks.
  • Ensure effective representation, consultation and cooperation to address health and safety issues in the workplace.
  • Encourage unions and employers to take a constructive role in improving health and safety practices.
  • Promote information, education and training on health and safety.
  • Provide effective compliance and enforcement measures.
  • Deliver continuous improvement and progressively higher standards of health and safety.

Key changes in the Act: While the Act remains largely similar to its predecessor, the Queensland Workplace Health and Safety Act 1995, some substantial changes exist:

  • Business operators must do what is reasonably practicable to eliminate or minimize risk to health and safety.
  • Company directors will have a positive and proactive duty to exercise due diligence. This represents a significant shift away from attributed liability (i.e. Being held liable for contraventions by the company) and requires directors to:
    • Acquire and keep up-to-date knowledge of health and safety matters.
    • Gain an understanding of hazards and risks associated with the company’s operations.
    • Ensure appropriate resources are available for use to eliminate or minimize risks from work carried out.
    • Ensure appropriate processes for obtaining information about incidents, hazards and risks, and responding to them.
    • Ensure processes for complying with duties are implemented, i.e. reporting, consultation arrangements, training and instruction.
    • Verify the provision and use of resources for the matters listed above.

What does all this mean? In short, the onus is shifting directly on to the shoulders of employers, including company directors, to be familiar with the risks and hazards associated with their business operations, and to provide appropriate control measures to ensure a safe working environment.

What is the status of the Act currently? As of January 1, 2012, most states have passed the relevant legislation to enact the new WHS laws. Currently seven out of nine jurisdictions have approved the model regulations and codes of practice. However, it should be noted that both Western Australia and Victoria have, thus far, not done so. Both states have voiced some concern that information delays and a lack of clarity from the Federal Government on some of the specifics of the WHS Regulations mean that their impact on business practices cannot be accurately assessed, and consequently have not yet introduced the new legislation. Currently, there has been no formal commitment from either state regarding their involvement.

For businesses in all other states in the Commonwealth, transitional arrangements have been developed by Safe Work Australia to assist organizations to move to the new harmonised arrangements and will be in place for 12 months (or more, where the new laws result in a new or significantly different set of responsibilities).

For further information on the Act, please refer to the this guide.

Milk ain’t oil: EPA sides with common sense

Yes, the line’s been used a hundred times in the past few days, but warrants repeating: U.S. dairy farmers needn’t cry over spilled milk any longer.

Beneath the sound and fury of political arguments over the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) right (nay, duty) to regulate greenhouse gases, the agency quietly sided last week with milk producers and finally exempted milk from oil spill control regulations.

The EPA has long required shippers of oil tanks and containers to develop spill control and prevention plans. Problem was, this included dairy farmers, since milk is defined as oil under the Clean Water Act because it contains animal fat (an oil). The regulations were originally designed for Big Oil, not farmers, but it has taken a few years for the agency to exempt dairy from the Act’s requirements. With the final ruling, milk, milk product containers, and milk production equipment are exempt from Clean Water Act shipping and container requirements, effective immediately.

Some estimates peg the savings from the move at nearly $150 million for U.S. milk and dairy farmers.

Unfortunately, critics of the EPA have used the episode to underscore the perceived futility of the organization, apparently forgetting that it is keeping them safe from irradiated food products, among other things.